How Churches Begin
The married couple Oleg and Marina, brand-new believers, knew they wanted a church. They had learned the gospel from an American missionary named Will, yet there was no evangelical Protestant church in their twenty-thousand-person city in the Ural Mountains of Russia.
“Lord, give us a church in our city,” they prayed.
One day in the market, Oleg and Marina met a watch repairman named Sergei. He had been in prison for stealing, but now the seventy-year-old man was a Christian. So was his wife, Zena, who had been a hardened atheist until her husband shared the gospel with her. Oleg and Marina noticed how Sergei used words like “God,” “blessing,” and “prayers.” Finally, Marina asked, “Are you a Christian?” When Sergei said he was, she responded, “So are we! And we have been praying to find more believers in order to have a church.” Sergei replied, “You must have been, because three days ago I prayed the same thing.”
Marina asked Will to teach her and Oleg, Sergei and Zena, and their single friend Olga—five in all. They met on the second floor of Sergei’s house, above the kitchen, in a room that serves as a bedroom and living room. For seven weeks Will explained the necessity of gospel belief, apostolic teaching, fellowship and accountability, the Lord’s Supper, prayer, service, giving, worship, and evangelism. He taught about the church from Matthew 18 and Acts 2. He then asked the group of five, “Will you commit to these things together?” Oleg replied, “Except for the Lord’s Supper we already do these things.” The five of them split up a loaf of freshly baked white bread and ate it. Then they passed around a cup. Each drank.
They were now a church. They gave themselves the name “Christ’s Church.” All this happened four years ago (as of this writing), and since then more family members and friends have come to faith and joined.
From week one, they were a multiethnic, multinational church, including Udmurts, Russians, and Americans (Will and his wife). Now Ukrainians and a Tatar also belong to their number.
Traditional Protestant Answers
Back, then, to our question: What made Oleg, Marina, Sergei, Zena, Olga, and Will and his wife a church?
Before we look to Scripture ourselves, let’s consider how Protestants before us, themselves drawing from Scripture, answered that question:
Lutherans. “A congregation of saints in which the gospel is rightly taught and the Sacraments are rightly administered” (Augsburg Confession, art. 7).
Anglicans. “A congregation of faithful men in which the pure Word of God is preached and the sacraments be duly ministered” (Thirty-Nine Articles, art. 19).
Presbyterians. “Those . . . that profess true religion; and . . . their children” in “particular churches, which are . . . more or less pure, according as the doctrine of the gospel is taught and embraced, ordinances administered, and public worship performed” (Westminster Confession of Faith, 25.2, 4).
Baptists. “A company of visible saints, called and separated from the world, by the Word and the Spirit of God, to the visible profession of the faith of the gospel, being baptized into the faith, and joined to the Lord, and each other, by mutual agreement, in the practical enjoyment of the ordinances” (1644 London Baptist Confession, art. 33).
Drawing from these definitions, we might say that Marina, Oleg, Sergei, and the rest became a church by gathering together for certain activities, namely, preaching and the ordinances. The church isn’t the activities; it’s the people (“congregation,” “company”) as constituted by certain activities (preaching, ordinances). Further, we would say that Marina and company remain “a church” even when they are not engaged in those activities.1
The dynamic here is reminiscent of what makes a team a team. A team is a group of people who play a sport together, but not only when they play the sport together. You wouldn’t call them a team if they never played as one. But insofar as they do, you would call them a team even when they are not together.2 The function creates the thing, without which there is no thing.
Citizens of a Heavenly Kingdom
What these older definitions addressed only implicitly, however, is the question of location or the gathering. The gathering was assumed. There were no video campuses requiring these early Protestants to tighten up that part of their definitions.
But can we delocalize what these confessions say a local or particular church is? My short answer is no. Jesus explicitly identifies himself with the gathering because the gathering makes his kingdom visible and active through their mutual agreement and testimony. The gathering is the “geography” of the kingdom.
To see that, let’s imagine Oleg and the other six under an X-ray machine that gives us a biblical perspective on the skeletal structure holding them together as a particular church. What would we see?
Among other things, we would discover that, through the gospel, these seven are held together as citizens of Christ’s kingdom. Their passports might say Udmurt, Russian, and American. Yet God delivered each of them “to the kingdom of his beloved Son” (Col. 1:13) and made them “fellow citizens” of this more ultimate nation (Eph. 2:19; also, Phil. 3:20). As such, their gatherings, set there in Russia’s Ural Mountains, are like outposts or embassies of this heavenly kingdom.
The biblical story of our church gatherings is set within the larger story of God’s kingdom and how God reveals his rule on earth.
Perhaps you are wondering, doesn’t Christ’s kingdom rule unite all Christians everywhere? Yes, it does: invisibly. What a local church does is make that rule visible. It expresses or manifests his kingdom rule in a way that everyone—insiders and outsiders—can actually see with their eyes and hear with their ears. This happens when a group of Christians physically gathers together, agrees upon the gospel to be preached, undertakes a naming ceremony (baptism), and then enjoys a regular family meal that affirms both the gospel and their unity (the Lord’s Supper).
We need the biblical X-ray machine to see this because, entering that second-floor room, we don’t see a kingdom, at least in terms that people typically associate with kingdoms. There are no flags, no government officials, no parliamentary buildings, no border entry stations. We only see this group of seven people doing what folk today call “religious” stuff.
Yet the biblical story of our church gatherings is set within the larger story of God’s kingdom and how God reveals his rule on earth. God walked with Adam and Eve in the garden, a King in his kingdom. His rule was public and visible, both in his own person and in their obedience. When God excommunicated Adam and Eve from the garden for their sin, God remained King over all creation, yet his rule became invisible.
The course of redemptive history and geography in the Bible is the story of God making his rule and kingdom visible at different times in different ways. (Picture a submarine surfacing from time to time while crossing the Atlantic.) God publicly expressed his kingdom rule in mighty acts of judgment and salvation, covenantal institutions like the temple, and covenantal signs like circumcision. Most interesting for our purposes here, God also made his kingdom visible in the gatherings of his people. The Old Testament refers to these as “the assembly of the Lord” and “the assembly of Israel,” and by the phrase “the day of the assembly.” We’ll come back to these in a moment.
Yet the story of the Old Testament is also the story of how inadequately the visible mechanisms of rule guide the human heart, which is desperately sick (Jer. 17:9). God therefore promised a new covenant, one that would establish his kingdom internally through the preaching of the gospel.
The new covenant, then, does its work, in the first instance, invisibly. The King forgives sins, giving every citizen of the covenant equal political standing before his throne. Then he writes his law on their hearts, so that every citizen will freely choose to obey (Jer. 31:31–34; Ezek. 36:24 –27). Word and Spirit conspire together to produce a kingdom where the law is just and people want to obey it (Ezek. 37:1–14).
Meditate for just a moment on that: laws and hearts match! It’s the greatest political program in history. It’s the promise of the kingdom of heaven on earth.
- “For Paul the ἐκκλησία is constituted not only by the act of assembling together in order to disperse after the conclusion of assembly; it maintains this name also outside of the concrete assembly. Thus [1 Cor.] 14:23: ‘If, therefore, the whole church assembles. . . .’ Assembly for worship is the center and at the same time the criterion for life in the church” (“ἐκκλησία,” in Exegetical Dictionary of the New Testament, ed. H. R. Balz and G. Schneider, vol. 1 [Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1990], 413).
- Miroslav Volf captures this when he writes: "The life of the church is not exhausted in the act of assembly. Even if the church is not assembled, it does live on as a church in the mutual service its members render to one another and in its common mission to the world. The church is not simply an act of assembling; rather it assembles at a specific place (see 1 Cor. 14:23). It is the people who in a specific way assemble at a specific place. In its most concentrated form however, the church does manifest itself concretely in the act of assembling for worship, and this is constitutive for its ecclesiality. (After Our Likeness[Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1998], 137)
This article is adapted from One Assembly: Rethinking the Multisite and Multiservice Church Models by Jonathan Leeman.
Like all healthy and satisfying relationships, our relationship with God needs time and energy.
What problems with our lives, priorities, and even theology do we not recognize? What would it look like to wake up to our own blind spots and to lovingly engage with those with whom we disagree?
People outside the four walls of the church will eagerly embrace the faith of believers who model the honesty and integrity for which they long.
You don’t join a church in order to be saved, but you may want to join the church to help you in making certain that you are saved.